We ALL had high hopes for the success of VHC.
When I first came to VHC, shortly after Ming, the stock hit $40, TWICE.
And that was only based on the VHC "story"
But, that was TEN YEARS ago.
In the end, VHC was never able to sell any of their technology to NON litigants.
No sales in the greatest sweet spot ever for VHC wrt cybersecurity.
Most blame AAPL and the reluctance of non-litigants to buy VHC gear because of litigation.
However, many of us, never believed that.
Then, over the years, the stock became more and more diluted and the management helped themselves to more and more benefits.
Now, it would take massive profits to lift the pp$.
There are very successful VHC competitors galore.
Really, who wants to mess with a sub-$2 stock??
You were one of the FEW who raised legit questions about VHC.
The Prime Board was created to avoid any such "negativity."
At least here, FREE speech rules and non-VHC discussions abide.
You can filter out anything you want with the IGNORE function.
GOOD to hear from you!!