" the courts should
long ago have put a stake in apple's heart, buried apple, covered it
with 5 feet of earth. court should be annoyed with apple and not give it
an ultimate victory."
And the courts should turn a blind eye to erroneously issued patents and the fleecing of companies by beneficiaries of the erroneously issued patents.
If you had read the dozen or so patents and the PTAB rulings and CAFC affirmations invalidating said patents would you feel any different if you did not have money invested in VHC stock? Would you feel any different if, instead of Apple, the company was a small start-up that you invested in. Or, being a Lawyer and all, would you believe in justice, and the PTO correcting their errors in issuing patents that were covered by prior art and obviousness. After all, PTO examiners are not all-knowing, and rely accurate info from the patent requesters and third parties, and many times pertinent info is overlooked or even withheld.
Wait just a gol-durn minute. You never read the patents or the PTAB rulings did you? Or you don't understand the technical aspects of the whole area. Why accuse Apple if you don't understand anything at all.