But what both Dr. Vivek Murthy and Press Secretary Jen Psaki neglect to say is that the biggest misinformation is coming from the CDC, FDA, and NIH.
Those organizations do not want you to know how many people have been
killed or permanently disabled by the COVID vaccines. And they want you
to believe that early treatments don’t work.
They don’t want you to know that their own data
shows that for the alpha variant, vaccination only makes sense if you
are over 30 years old and for the delta variant, because it is nearly 7
times less deadly, vaccination makes no sense at all: for all ages, it will kill more people than it will save.
Finally, early treatments are the superior alternative: they are proven
in practice to have a higher risk reduction and better safety profile
than any of the current vaccines. The NIH and WHO are deliberately suppressing this information in order to push the “mass vaccination is the only option” false narrative (breaking with 70 years of established science).
Before publishing this article, we
reached out several times by phone and email to Dr. Steven Anderson at
the FDA who is in charge of monitoring the VAERS safety signals for the
FDA. Neither Dr. Anderson nor his staff would respond to our
offers to provide the FDA with the information our team had learned from
extensive analysis of the VAERS data. This made it clear to us
that the FDA would simply like to avoid having to address all the
safety signals we found (we found a lot and they are very significant).
Let’s take a look at the OFFICIAL PRIMARY DATA SOURCE that is used by
the CDC and FDA to monitor adverse events caused by the vaccines. It is
known as VAERS: vaccine adverse event reporting system.
But here, there is no limit to how many people can be killed. Nobody
in government will call for a halt. We are at 438 cases of
Guillain-Barre Syndrome, over 9,000 deaths reported, and 438,440 adverse
event reports. This is a clinical trial without a stopping condition.
Because these vaccines are not FDA
approved and this is just an extended clinical trial, each and every
adverse effect reported must be ascribed to the drug unless proven
otherwise. The burden of proof is on the manufacturers at this point to show that these adverse effects were not drug related. They have not met that burden.
They haven’t even shown a single death or single adverse event was not
likely caused or exacerbated by these vaccines. They are silent. We
couldn’t find any events that appeared non-causal either. Nor could anyone else we asked.
Therefore, the safest course for the public in the interim, is to
assume that all of these events are all related to the experimental
vaccines. This would then require the FDA to immediately shut down the
trial for safety concerns.
We know there are a lot of people who mistakenly believe that the
burden is on VaccineTruth to prove that the vaccines are unsafe. But the
FDA rules say that that is not the way causality works in drug clinical trials.
If it worked that way, every drug would be approved because there would
be no incentive for anyone to invest the resources to prove the adverse
events were caused by the drug (or experimental vaccine in this case).
Many people who write articles about VAERS (such as this article on VAERS by Dr. David Katz)
claim that there is nothing to see that all the reports are simply
“background” events that would have happened anyway, even if the
injection were just a saline solution. Yet none of these people have
ever actually looked INSIDE the database itself. If they did, they would
find that they would be unable to explain the cause of the 9,000 excess
Can anyone find a single case in VAERS in 2021 where the
person got the COVID19 vaccine, died within 30 days, and where the
vaccine was not a significant (if not sole) contributor to the cause of
death? Please let us know in the comments. We couldn’t find one and nobody we asked publicly on Twitter could find one either.
We expect that 2% of the fatality records will be coincidental and not
causal. Note that death by suicide right after vaccination is pretty
common because people are so despondent on the damage done by the
vaccines. This is something that is well known to vaccine victims. Ask
yourself: if you were planning to kill yourself tomorrow, would you get
The mainstream media will NEVER ask the CDC for their
analysis of the death data, because it would instantly reveal that the
CDC, NIH, and FDA have been lying to the American people since
the start of the vaccination program. They’ve known all along that the
vast majority of the reported deaths have no plausible explanation other
than the vaccine.
Based on multiple independent methods (direct people survey comparing
# dead from COVID vs. # dead from vaccine, doctor surveys (COVID
deaths, vaccine deaths, # of patients), news stories of 4 BA pilots out
of 4,000 dead, and 5 JetBlue Pilots dead out of 3714 pilots), we can make a “best guess” estimate that the death rate from these vaccines is over 1 in 1,500 which suggests that at least 100,000 previously healthy Americans have died.
That estimate suggests that VAERS is under-reported by a factor of
10. So the 438,000 people who reported one or more adverse events
translates into over 4.3M people who have been impacted.
When we look in detail into the fatalities by age, we find that if you are under 30, VAERS shows that the vaccines will kill more people than will be saved (see the download for detailed calculation which was done with a 4.5 conservative multiplier).
But the other thing you have to consider is that the 300 to 500
deaths each year on that chart are almost all “background deaths” that
are coincidental because people die every day… The actual deaths caused
by previous vaccines are typically fewer than 10 per year reported to
VAERS per vaccine. So when cases reported into VAERS spikes to over
10,000 death reports in the first 6 months, and the propensity to report
hasn’t changed significantly from previous years, it’s very clear that
something is very seriously wrong.
Some people say this is just due to increased “awareness.” But that
is easily shown to be false. If you look at the deaths reported from all
other vaccines combined, they are comparable in 2021 to other years
(166 deaths for all other vaccines in the first 6 months of 2021 which
is the background rate). So if we excluded the COVID19 vaccines from the
graph above, it would look perfectly normal! No one can explain how
this can happen if the vaccines are “perfectly safe” (but if you think
you know, please tell us in the comments below).
We have multiple ways other ways to prove there is no excess
reporting (e.g., by looking at event counts that are unrelated to the
vaccine, e.g., ear aches).
When we take a closer look at the VAERS data, we have multiple ways to prove the COVID vaccines are causing a large number of serious adverse events, including death (we use the Bradford-Hill criteria for determining causality).
To do a quick reality check, we did a public survey (in plain sight on Twitter)
and asked people, “how many people do you know who have been killed by
COVID?” and “How many people do you know who died shortly after
vaccination?” We were surprised: the numbers we basically equal. We
encourage you to do this same simple experiment with your friends. The
results will shock you because you will see for yourself that the vaccines may have killed almost as many people as the virus.
So when Anthony Fauci said on July 11 that it is “almost inexplicable” that some people resist getting vaccinated you have to wonder how Fauci can be so completely clueless about the safety data that is in plain sight.
He should be asking the opposite question: why would anyone want to get
the vaccine now when it is more likely to kill them than to save them?
The NIH, FDA, and CDC do not see anything wrong at all. They think
this is a perfectly safe vaccine that has killed nobody. Which is very
strange because when we looked at the VAERS data we can clearly see a
large number of serious event rates that are, in almost every case, more
than 10X above “normal.” There is a nice table in the download
summarizing this. You can replicate all these queries yourself.
It got us thinking…. wouldn’t it be great if we had a Q&A document that was … honest?
So we decided it was about time that somebody wrote a comprehensive
FAQ that didn’t pull any punches and answers all questions honestly.
Questions such as:
How many previously healthy people have been killed or
permanently disabled by these vaccines? Could it be more than 100,000?
How do we know?
Why aren’t they stopping these vaccines after 50 deaths reported in VAERS?
did the CDC prove that the vaccines didn’t cause all the neurological
and cardiovascular events? It certainly appears that the majority of
deaths satisfy the Bradford-Hill causality criteria.
analysis of the VAERS fatality data by age and the CDC data clearly
shows that for people under 30 the vaccine kills more people than it
would save, why would the CDC want to vaccinate anyone under 30?
(Answer: because the CDC has no cost-benefit analysis by age that takes
into account the VAERS fatality data; there is a reason they don’t show
it to you).
If the vaccine isn’t causing any symptoms, then why
is there a dramatic difference between the number of events associated
with the first dose vs. the second dose? Note: This question is
extremely problematic. Nobody at the FDA or CDC can answer that question. And the press will never ask it. They don’t want you to learn the truth.
the CDC ever figure out that the vaccines are unsafe and should have
been stopped after 50 people were killed? (Answer: that is really
unlikely. The are not focused on safety at all. Any competent unbiased
statistician who looks at the VAERS data is appalled and the more they
look, the more appalled they get).
How serious can these vaccines be long-term? (The answer to this should frighten everyone)
is the CDC recommending that women who are pregnant get vaccinated when
we don’t have the data on the effect of the vaccine on the baby?
Couldn’t we be setting ourselves up for a huge tragedy for the family,
the baby, and society? Why not at least wait 9 months to see if the
vaccines are safe for pregnant women?
Why does the FDA’s
Director of the Office Of Biostatistics And Epidemiology (Steven
Anderson) refuse to even look at the data showing all the adverse events
caused by these vaccines? What is he afraid of?
Will anyone in
Congress ever ask for the FDA report showing that the vaccine couldn’t
have caused any of the deaths reported in VAERS? Why is Congress so
afraid to ask for this?
Why is the vaccine causing so many neurological and cardiovascular problems (see our giant table in the document)?
there a significant neurological and/or cardiovascular adverse event
that is not triggered by the vaccines (Answer: we haven’t found one
How can I treat my post-vaccine inflammation syndrome (PVIS)?
can I fight vaccine mandates from my employer or school? What did they
do wrong in the Houston Methodist case? Where can I join a class action?
Can I get compensated for my vaccine injuries?
Is this vaccine really more deadly than all of the other 70 vaccines combined in the last 30 years? (answer: Yes)
claim there are no deaths from the vaccines. How are they categorizing
all the dead bodies from the vaccine? (this answer to this one surprised
us and it will really surprise you; it was buried in one sentence in a
paper that few people have read)
Why haven’t the FDA and CDC
investigated the fraud in the Pfizer Phase 3 trial where a 12 year old
(Maddie de Garay) became permanently paralyzed less than 24 hours after
taking the vaccine? Pfizer reported as a minor event. The FDA knows
about the case, promised to investigate, and did nothing. Why? And why
isn’t the press asking about the fraud??
Is early treatment a
better option than vaccines? Why has the NIH not promoted any of these
treatments despite clear and compelling evidence that they work with
well over 98% risk reduction?
Why aren’t there any autopsies for
people who die after vaccination? Don’t people want to prove that it
wasn’t the vaccine that killed these people?
If the vaccine is
so safe, then how come half the deaths happen within 3 days of
vaccination? And why does the death rate peak on the second day since
there would be a higher propensity to report a death within 24 hours?
How do you explain that? (we explain why this is in the document)
the vaccine is so safe, how come there are so many deaths of people
under 30 in their sleep less than 24 hours after vaccination? That never
happens so how do you explain those deaths?
Why were people who died 15 minutes after vaccination removed from the VAERS reporting system?
How many people have to die before they call a halt to the nonsense?
Why isn’t the press asking any of these questions?
can four British Airways pilots all die shortly after vaccination? How
can BA claim that the deaths aren’t linked if they don’t know the
vaccination dates of the four pilots? And why won’t they answer that
question (as to how they KNOW the deaths are not linked)?
it up to 2,500 times safer to opt for early treatment than the vaccine
if you want to avoid permanent neurological or cardiovascular damage?
(it’s a simple calculation anyone can do)
Why aren’t any
Democratic committee chairmen asking NIH for Tony Fauci’s unredacted
emails so we can expose the fact that he funded the creation of the
virus and then tried to cover it up after he became aware that the virus
escaped? And why isn’t the press asking them this question? We’ve asked this question ourselves, but they all refuse to answer.
are the NIH and WHO pretending that early treatments don’t work when it
is obvious to everyone, including the WHO’s top consultant on
ivermectin, that they do work? He even published a paper in a top
peer-reviewed journal about it.
How can Moderna send the
University of North Carolina a coronavirus vaccine to test two weeks
before anyone knew COVID even existed? How did Moderna know in advance
the exact best vaccine to create? (if you want to see a copy of the MTA,
download the doc and then download the reference doc listed at the end
of that doc)
Will a safe vaccine be available soon? From what company? When?
are top universities like Stanford and Harvard requiring vaccination
for students when they’ve never done the calculation that would show the
policy would kill (and disable) more students than it would save?
Shouldn’t they at least have the numbers derived from the VAERS system
to show the parents? (sure, but they don’t!) Why aren’t any parents
asking for this? (answer: Parents trust the CDC assertions). How can we
be telling our kids to get a vaccine that is more likely to kill them
than to save them if we’ve never looked at the numbers? (answer: Most
parents don’t think to question authority. They go along with
How come there is still no informed consent for the
vaccine experiment underway? Isn’t the CDC supposed to share the rates
of death and disability?
Aren’t these experiments a violation of multiple parts of the Nuremberg Code?
is the proof that nobody has been killed or permanently injured from
the vaccines? Since these vaccines are not approved, the burden is on
the drug company to show that all the deaths and permanent disabilities
in VAERS were not vaccine related. Where is the analysis and why is it
kept hidden (if it exists)?
Can we at least see Pfizer’s
analysis of Maddie de Garay’s case where she was permanently paralyzed
less than 24 hours after the shot? Why is the press not asking for this
analysis? Or asking why nobody at the CDC, FDA, or NIH followed up on this case
even though they know about it for sure. She was in the Pfizer 12-15
year old clinical trial. Surely, there must be an analysis proving her
sudden paralysis was caused by “something else” but as of July 15, 2021
nobody has contacted the family to get the case history. Why is this
girl being ignored?
We asked Monica Gandhi, a prominent infectious disease expert at UCSF, “Are scientific dissenters best dealt with through assassination threats and government encouraged censorship?
Or do you support open scientific debate?” She did not respond. It is a
tough question, isn’t it? Need time to ponder that one.
won’t anyone from any of the federal agencies (CDC, FDA, NIH), the fact
checkers employed by mainstream media, the White House, the Surgeon
General, Congress, or academia will answer (or ask) any of these
questions posed above?
Ask these same people why they are all
afraid to debate Dr. Robert Malone, Professor Byram Bridle, Dr. Peter
McCullough, Dr. Bret Weinstein, Dr. Chris Martenson, and others on
vaccine safety? Answer: they are afraid of losing badly, very badly.
If you want to know the answer to these and more questions, you’ve come to the right place.
Here’s the link to the answers you seek. It is a long document, you
will find that the time you invest in reading it is time that is well
spent. It may save your life or the lives of your kids. Because it is a
living document and it is an opinion piece, it can’t be peer reviewed.
However, readers are welcome to identify any errors in the comments