FDA efficacy question revisited | DNDNQ Message Board Posts

Dendreon Corporation

  DNDNQ website

DNDNQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message



Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  60873 of 486600  at  3/31/2007 12:10:00 AM  by


FDA efficacy question revisited

When the AC panelists were asked if the trial results establish that the product is efficacious, it was obvious they were all struggling with the wording of the question.  Specifically the word "establish" was mentioned repeatedly.  So I looked up the definition of the word, of which one is: to put beyond doubt, to prove.
Obviously many drugs have been approved that didn't meet the requiremints of this question as presented.
So, I decided to see how the question was presented to others.  This led me to this page on the NCI website:
  Understanding the Approval Process for New Cancer Treatments
Final Approval

As the FDA looks at all the data submitted and the results of its own review, it applies two benchmark questions to each application:

  • Do the results of well-controlled studies provide substantial evidence of the treatment's effectiveness?
  • Do the results show the product is safe under the conditions of use in the proposed labeling? In this context, "safe" means that potential benefits have been determined to outweigh any risks.
What immediatly becomes apparent is the first question asked to our panel was not the standard FDA wording.  The re-worded question was the one that should have been asked in the first place.

     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 65     Views: 367
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
60884 Re: FDA efficacy question revisited/who done it? bassesful 3 3/31/2007 12:25:06 AM
60984 Re: FDA efficacy question revisited filosofer989 1 3/31/2007 5:50:55 AM
61022 Re: FDA efficacy question revisited ming the merciless 13 3/31/2007 8:43:56 AM
61065 Re: FDA efficacy question revisited eagleeyeinvestor 5 3/31/2007 9:58:05 AM

About Us  •  Contact Us  •  Follow Us on Twitter  •  Members Directory  •  Help Center  •  Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Create Account
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
© 2003-2019 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
Financial Market Data provided by