savas drug can reportly affect the if I remember it right, the 'filaman protein', and then created a test that can detect the change occurred (ie, we can add this compound to water, and confirm thru a test it does turn the water 'red'.) It gets to claim it 'works'. Yet the evidence that it 'really' means anything is at best (from what I have read) presented as a secondary/anecdotal indication rather than being the first thing touted.
Then yesterday, a puff piece comes out yesterday from that reputable source called seeking alpha... that included the 'potential' for it to be approved without running a ph 3.. yep, its doing that 'good' (smile)...
just a pondering in comparison to the difference between these two and more importantly WHY is AVXL's 'results' not getting the same treatment. Is it because they don't have a test to prove they can 'turn the water red'?? The fact that it hasn't been PROVEN to actually result in meaningful results can be overcome with a few 'reports' that someone(s) 'appears' to be doing better??
Similar to what if my research of AVXL is all they are saying at this point as well... maybe they need to claim they can turn the water blue, develop a test to prove they can.. hmmm