here Walsh letter Cort respond to | CORT Message Board Posts

Corcept Therapeutics Inc

  CORT website

CORT   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  2499 of 2516  at  2/10/2019 5:59:53 PM  by

shiraz


 In response to msg 2498 by  joeytakasugi
view thread

Re: here Walsh letter Cort respond to

I'm not a lawyer but reading TEVA's respond:
 
"U.S. Patent Nos. 9,829,495 and 8,921,348 are the subject of the 30-month stay of approval."
 
However, new U.S. Patent  and any newly issued patents are not the subject of the 30-month stay or as TEVA lawyer wrote: 
 
"Under Corcept’s proposed schedule, consolidation with the new case would delay the resolution of this case until well after the expiration of the 30-month stay—which, in addition to being unnecessary, could lead to preliminary-injunction proceedings."
 
That's why 30 months is not the max time but if Corcept's proposed schedule is accepted then it will be longer than 30 months.
 
Please prove me if I'm wrong. 
 


     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 0     Views: 134
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board


About Us    Contact Us    Follow Us on Twitter    Members Directory    Help Center    Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Create Account
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
2003-2018 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...