From Gilford Securities (*edit 10:40 pm: I've removed a portion of it, now that many of you seen it):
'The patent reexamination of '181 should not come as a surprise - claims 1-29
being "rejected" was expected (in our opinion). It is a non-final action and all claims
being "rejected" simply means they will be reviewed - it does not imply the
patent is invalid or will be invalidated.'
'... approximately 95% of all reexam requests
'...we emphasize all are standard processes that have not
had any negative repercussions.'
'Any information disseminated that implies this document is a "negative" should
be disregarded, in our opinion.'