|
|
|
|
||
Re: Arthrex Decision // mink //mutual it is not that there was a dissent. it is that some justices held x and some held y and some held z. so on one point you had a group of justices agreeing to something but for different reasons. same with other points. so do not have clear court holdings. separate justices found different things even if they joined in an opinion on a point. |
return to message board, top of board |