yet, he does not sue neil for stealing valuable info posted on vhc prime. he says neal has posted screen shots here of vhc prime posts. neal, not a credible souce, claims he somehow has access to vhc prime. who is leaking? jww needs to have court find neil can not obtain info from a private board. is it a civil or criminal violation? but, is neal or the leaker liable? can jww prove neal has access and how? neal violating one of blue's rules? if neal loses the case, he may succeed in having the court award jww an acorn, finding that is the value of the vhc prime posts. but, neal might appeal, arguing that vhc prime posts have a negative value and those who have followed the vhc pumpers, even ming, have bought and held, and lost money, and could have made a lot if they were in stock indexes.
meanwhile, those not allowed into the wisdom of vhc prime have no clue why vhc pps is up today and in general despite actions of d j in e d texas. aapl 5 is a crap shoot - but vhc prime may know aapl 5 will lead to a much bigger judgment amount than aapl 4 did.