You're
right. Except in the case of the '504, '135, and '151 patent
invalidations are still alive because they are remanded to the PTAB and
not reversed (keeping the possibility of invalidation alive). And while
CAFC did affirm the '211 patent invalid, I don't remember if VirnetX
asked for rehearing or en banc---the multiple actions around this
nonsense makes my old head spin.
P.S: No Nattering Nabob of Negatism here... I just feel the overpowering need to correct posted nonsense. If you wouldn't have posted your nonsense I would not have felt the need to set the record straight