Re: Legal Summary from ASM reminder oral arguments can be watched..replay..Navidea lawyer doing really good framing
I actually got the impression as a novice that the facts packaging was useful to the panel in the type of follow-up questions. CRG counsel came across as very annoyed to even be challenged on jurisdiction and facts and even having to be at the hearing ie by asserting appealed in Texas so that invalidated Ohio appeal. Wonder if it came across that way to the judge panel? Or to anyone else?