The rulings of the PTAB stops nothing. The fat lady is not done yet!
::::Sheasby in the Micron #203 case—filing 11 Sealed Replies to Micron's responses to Netlist motions today. —Summary Judgment That The Asserted Patents Are Not Standard-Essential —Summary Judgment of No Anticipation as to the '060 and '160 Patents and that 2012 Design Review is Not Prior Art —Summary Judgment Dismissing Micron's Affirmative Defense of Breach of RAND Obligation Or In The Alternative for Severance —Partial Summary Judgment Finding Alleged Prior Art Not Publicly Accessible —Summary Judgment of No Patent Misuse —Summary Judgment Regarding IPR Estoppel as to the '918 and '054 Patents —Summary Judgment on Micron's Equitable Defenses —Strike Certain Opinions Of Defendants' Expert John B. Halbert —Strike Opinions Of Dr. Matthew Lynde —Strike Opinions of Gary Woods —Strike Certain Opinions of Defendants' Expert Dr. Harold Stone And 1—Omnibus Motion in Limine—by Micron last night
Copied :::: Thanks Durango
$NLST I know most of you experienced longs get it but for those who may not yet, I'm just going to break it down as far as my understanding goes. I could be wrong so correct me if I am if you are a legal expert, or confirm if you agree. Regarding Sheasby's ESTOPPEL filing on the 054 and 918, Sheasby is asking Judge Gilstrap for a summary judgment ruling basically telling the PTAB to pound sand and that our April 2023 jury ruling in Texas on the 054 and 918 sets precident over the PTAB. He wants that summary judgement before he gets to court. That's the PTAB vs Court/Jury battle I was saying was coming up. Am I out to lunch .