Interesting discussion on PTAB and Federal Court disagreement | NLST Message Board Posts


NLST   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message    Post Message    Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  3653 of 3879  at  12/6/2023 2:08:24 PM  by

vanv0028


Interesting discussion on PTAB and Federal Court disagreement


There have been interesting discussions with legal blog post
references on the situation when the US Federal Court and the PTAB
disagree from the Stocktwits NLST board.

There is precedent. Here is a blog for a case where PTAB ruled
a patent invlid because of obviousness while a Federal Judge ruled
it valid. The PTAB was over ruled (the judges patent validity ruling
was upheld) because the patent solved a problem that did not have a solution.

BLOG URL is:
https://www.markmanadvisors.com/blog/2019/5/1/what-happens-when-a-district-court-and-the-ptab-disagree-over-the-validity-of-a-patent

I think the no solution reasoning applies to NLST patents.

Someone on Stocktwits also posted a blog analysis of the PTAB
judges who only need approval of the Secretary of Commerce to
be appointed. A large percentage were junior law firm associates
who were not even partners. Here is the blog:

https://ipwatchdog.com/2018/03/06/ptab-judges-shockingly-inexperienced/id=94438/h

I think US patent exaimers need technical not legal experience to be hired.

I added more shares.


     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
|  
Recs: 4  
   Views: 0 []
Previous Message  Next Message    Post Message    Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
3654 Re: Interesting discussion on PTAB and Federal Court disagreement JeffsWaterWorks 2 12/6/2023 10:22:34 PM
3655 Re: Interesting discussion on PTAB and Federal Court disagreement squarebz 5 12/6/2023 10:36:42 PM




Financial Market Data provided by
.
Loading...