There have been interesting discussions with legal blog post
references on the situation when the US Federal Court and the PTAB
disagree from the Stocktwits NLST board.
There is precedent. Here is a blog for a case where PTAB ruled
a patent invlid because of obviousness while a Federal Judge ruled
it valid. The PTAB was over ruled (the judges patent validity ruling
was upheld) because the patent solved a problem that did not have a solution.
BLOG URL is:
I think the no solution reasoning applies to NLST patents.
Someone on Stocktwits also posted a blog analysis of the PTAB
judges who only need approval of the Secretary of Commerce to
be appointed. A large percentage were junior law firm associates
who were not even partners. Here is the blog:
I think US patent exaimers need technical not legal experience to be hired.
I added more shares.