Shame it's the WSJ though, they have gone downhill since the new ownership took over. You used tho look to them for sort of a chamber-of-commerce, Eisenhower-Republican take on things....., conservative, business oriented, but not heavy on the hot button social issues or twisting minor business stories for political reason.
It's one of two bad things:
The WSJ reporters and editors don't understand what the XM bank does, and what an utterly good thing it is for us to help other nations buy US goods and services (meaning they don't understand business)
or
They do know what the XM bank does, but are so partisan and immoral that they aren't above lying about this just because they hate Obama (meaning they are propagandists, not journalists).
btw, I'm not a big Obama fan. I just like good, competent news reporting, and I prefer it in print rather than on TV, so that makes the WSJ taking a dive a real disappointment.