Perhaps you should reread my post, Bill.
I said a new (& expensive) CEO would be a good sign.
I did not say PRH needed one.
If PRH thought it needed one (because they and their consultants weren't as good at handling something big), it would be a good sign that they were willing to spend the money that would be needed to get someone good.
I do not expect a real qualified CEO unless Provectus some day becomes a normal solvent public company that raises money by selling common shares.