Re: The Byrne Tin Hat theory vs. Stalker true actions
A CEO of a not-quite Billion dollar company states:
>>> there is an Establishment of powerful, wealthy Wall Street Elites whose ownership of the financial press is used both to manipulate stocks to the benefit of the hedge funds and prime brokers, and stalk, harass, and attack anyone who tries to expose their game. Their compliant financial press does their bidding,....<<
That's quite a theory [!]; but Patrick, you do know that in practice your employee used his quotidian belief in this scheme of yours to slime and libel an entirely innocent private citizen, one who had no connection to your company whatsoever. The employee has yet to apologize or publicly retract the falsehood.
How do you defend such a lapse of ethics?