Re: A question for Judd
Hi. Someone's email brought these thread to my attention.
It is obvious that the miscreants go silent when exposed, and then have allies throw out distracting questions that they would never answer themselves (such as Judd's question about Gary Weiss' email that Sam dodges over and over). That said, I can lay some of these to rest (ANSWERS IN CAPS):
Do you like Patrick Byrne “celebrate” the SEC subpoena? I BELIEVE THEY CAME IN LONG BEFORE JUDD WAS HIRED.
If you do “celebrate” the subpoena, why are you not being transparent relating to your actions? JUDD IS EING FAR MORE TRANSPARENT THAN GARY ET. AL. YOUR SELECTIVE OUTRAGE, SAME, IS SHEER HYPOCRISY: WHY NOT ENCOURAGE GARY TO ANSWER JUDD'S QUESTION?
Is the purpose of the website antisocialmedia.net to skirt the intent of regulation FD or any other securities law statutes? NOPE. NO IDEA HOW IT COULD POSSIBLY BE CONSTRUED THAT WAY.
Is the purpose of the website antisocialmedia.net to skirt the any current or future subpoenas from the Securities and Exchange Commission? NOPE. AGAIN, THERE IS NOTHING THAT WOULD RMEOTELY SUPPORT SUCH A CLAIM, SO THIS IS JUST MORE INNUENDO.
Is the purpose of the website antisocialmedia.net to hinder, delay, or obstruct any investigation of the Securities and Exchange Commission? NOPE: YOUR INNUENDO IS GETTING STUPID HERE.
Are you fully responsible for all content in the name of antisocialmedia.net or from the web site antisocialmedia.net? I'LL LET JUDD ANSWER THAT, BUT I THINK THE ANSWER IS 'NO'.
Do you stand by the truthfulness of all the content from the website antisocialmedia.net and any content you have disseminated in the name of antisocialmedia.net? JUDD IS AN INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST, AND I THINK HAS SHOWN FAR MORE CARE THAN YOUR KNUCKLEHEAD CROWD IN THAT REGARD.
Have you used any resources directly or indirectly from Overstock.com to assist you and others from antisocialmedia.net? NOPE
Have you done any work (directly or indirectly) related to antisocialmedia.net during your working hours at Overstock.com? JUDD'S WORKING HOURS ARE PRETTY STRANGE AND HARD TO DELINEATE. THAT IS, HE IS ONLINE ABOUT 20 HOURS/DAY. BUT AT OVERSTOCK, HE WORKS ON OVERSTOCK STUFF.
Have you used any anonymous aliases posting on any web sites during the period you began your employment at Overstock.com?
Can you provide such a list of all such aliases and all communications you have made under such aliases? I BET HE COULD, BUT I WOULD TELL HIM I WOULD ADVISE HIM NOT TO DO SO. I AM CONFIDENT THAT THE WORK HE DOES IN CYBERSAPCE EXPOSING THIS GANG IS DONE WITHOUT REFERENCE TO OVERSTOCK, OUR STOCK PRICE, INSISDE INFORMATION, ETC. REMEMBER, THE 1ST AMENDMENT APPLIES NOT JUST TO BENT JOURNALISTS, BUT TO CITIZENS TOO. DEAL WITH IT.