What does TURV really own // Risky | TURV Message Board Posts

Two Rivers Water & Farming Company

  TURV website
  • TECH UPDATE: Please accept our apologies for the delay in getting our "board visit & message view" counts to normalize. As you may have noticed, starting yesterday the "board stats" for individual message boards started to display clearly erroneous "member" and "guest" visit counts. Needless to say, we don't like having unreliable traffic stats on the site any more than you do. Please understand this was not by design or intention. It's a glitch that resulted from an apparent incompatibility with the legacy code and the recent deployment of new servers to tackle issues related to last month's outage. In order to give our web developer a chance to take a closer look at the glitch and come up with a viable solution, we have decided to leave the code up for now so she can have real-world data to work with (rather than just turn the counts off again). So it looks like we may have to live with these bad counts a little longer, but our expectation is to have this resolved by early next week, if not sooner. We appreciate your patience and understanding.  

TURV   /  Message Board  /  Read Message



Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  7291 of 7310  at  9/23/2020 4:50:07 PM  by


The following message was updated on 9/23/2020 4:51:36 PM.

 In response to msg 7290 by  Riskyinvestor
view thread

Re: What does TURV really own // Risky

As far as I know, just like with GrowCo, any and all assets are collateralized by various note-holders and preferred share-holders (sometimes two or three times over).
I don't think TURV owns 41% of the Dam--- HCIC owns 41% of the Dam, and there is no longer a Dam to own. TURV owns 41% of the stock in HCIC. What HCIC has, that Great Plains needs, is the "Storage Rights" needed to store the water that Great Plains owns via their purchase of the Welton Water Group, and the Dam site they also own outright. If Great Plains already has the needed $42M in escrow they will own 100% of the Dammed Dam---site and all.
Great Plains only needed 51% of HCIC shares to control the HCIC Water Board to give them the needed "Storage Rights". Once they have their ownership and control authenticated by the Court it's all over but the shouting. They really have no need to go after the remaining HCIC shares, and certainly not acquire the indebted mess that is TURV.
The revenue to HCIC and on down to TURV will not be gross revenue, but will be net revenue. Great Plains will get the gross revenue, and after deducting the lease fee for the Dam and site, and the "Surface Rights" water that they also own, the resulting net revenue will be passed on to HCIC and subsequently divided up between itself (Great Plains), TURV, and the few other remaining HCIC shareholders. How much that net revenue is will be determined by how generous Great Plains is, and the current and past behavior of TURV.
The shell companies will do what they were created to do, and that's allowing all the associated bag-holders to bend over and take it in the rear (as always), while management party's on and goes it's merry way. 
Yeah, the company bugler is warming up and limbering up his lips---getting ready to play Taps.  

     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 0     Views: 177
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Financial Market Data provided by