'Discussion' between Linus and PJ | SCOXQ Message Board Posts


SCOXQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message    Post Message    Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  7150 of 168721  at  9/24/2006 2:43:30 PM  by

wallybass


 In response to msg 7137 by  
view thread

Re: 'Discussion' between Linus and PJ

There is an interesting discussion going on on GL, between Linus and PJ, about GPL3. It's kind of hard to follow because Linus posts as anonymous and there are so many other "contributors" to the discussion. Here is a set of links that might be useful in getting through the discussion as pertains to Linus and PJ.

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060922134536257#c481727

"Kernel developers' position on GPLv3" Anonymous: simply points to a lwn.net article

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=481727#c481922

"This is really bad news" Anonymous: complains that lwn comments weren't "submitted though gplv3.fsf.org"

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=481922#c481977

"This is really bad news" Linus (anonymous): answers above, says "they were", discussion starts

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=481977#c481978

"This is really bad news" Madscientist: asks Linus about inadequacies of GPL 2

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=481978#c481991

"This is really bad news" Linus (anonymous): says GPL2 is enough, makes "scare tactics" connection between GPL3 "curtailing rights" and US's "war on terrorism" approach curtailing rights

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=481991#c481997

"This is really bad news" PJ: concludes that GPL2 is broken because "Tivo" happened, implies that GPL3 "fixes" it

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=481997#c482040

"This is really bad news" Linus: calls "bullocks" on that one

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=482040#c482067

"This is really bad news" PJ: Accuses Linus of "argument by putdown" (perhaps the ultimat in pot-kettle)

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060922134536257&type=article&pid=482067#c482074

"This is really bad news" Linus (anonymous): Ask's PJ to listen to herself.

It's still ongoing, and gets easier to follow at this point, I think.

People here often discuss the follies of "religious fundamentalism." If that interests you, then this might too, because it is really a similar discussion, but in a context that some would claim is not religious.

Wally Bass



     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
|  
Recs: 8  
   Views: 143 []
Previous Message  Next Message    Post Message    Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
7151 Re: 'Discussion' between Linus and PJ ruidh 5 9/24/2006 3:09:59 PM
7152 Re: 'Discussion' between Linus and PJ lttscoparty 6 9/24/2006 3:39:48 PM
7161 Re: 'Discussion' between Linus and PJ error27 1 9/24/2006 8:04:46 PM
7166 Re: 'Discussion' between Linus and PJ jldill22 16 9/24/2006 9:57:46 PM




Financial Market Data provided by
.
Loading...