Has anyone considered this? | SCOXQ Message Board Posts


SCOXQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message    Post Message    Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  169233 of 169337  at  9/18/2023 7:44:38 AM  by

rkhalloran


 In response to msg 169227 by  BritTim
view thread

Re: Has anyone considered this?

>> I do not think there is anything explicit in the law that mandates electors to vote for the candidate who won their state under all circumstances. (Correct me if I am wrong.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector

As of 2020, 33 states and the District of Columbia have laws that require electors to vote for the candidates for whom they pledged to vote, though in half of these jurisdictions there is no enforcement mechanism. In 14 states, votes contrary to the pledge are voided and the respective electors are replaced, and in two of these states they may also be fined. Three other states impose a penalty on faithless electors but still count their votes as cast.


     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
|  
Recs: 1  
   Views: 0 []
Previous Message  Next Message    Post Message    Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
169234 Re: Has anyone considered this? BritTim 2 9/18/2023 9:05:41 AM




Financial Market Data provided by
.
Loading...