The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud | SCOXQ Message Board Posts

SCOXQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  153251 of 154248  at  9/17/2019 4:11:40 PM  by

walterbyrd


 In response to msg 153238 by  BritTim
view thread

Re: The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud

> In the case of Ramirez, 25 people were identified by her as potential witnesses. The FBI interviewed none of them. The New York Times claims to have seven witnesses who confirm Ramirez' account.

All this from fake news NYT? You know that NYT had to revise the story to include the - very relevant - part about the so-called "victim" having no idea wtf the NYT is going on about.

That part of the story was in the original story, but NYT editors removed it. Wonder why?

"Potential witnesses" and what NYT claims is meaningless.

Other recent fake news from NYT:

- NYT Trump tax story leaves out NYC real estate crash
- NTY forced to correct Manafort Russia "bombshell"
- NYT lies about Nikki Haley's curtains
- NYT blames Sarah Palin for shooting
- NYT change Trump headline to appease left
- NYT amends K.T. McFarland 'scoop'


     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 2     Views: 21
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
About Us  •  Contact Us  •  Follow Us on Twitter  •  Members Directory  •  Help Center  •  Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Create Account
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
© 2003-2019 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...