Re: Independent study into collapse of World Trade Center Building 7
>>>>walterbyrd, in #153159, says: Posting conspiracy theories? Why is it okay for you to do it, but not Alex Jones?<<<<
>>BritTim says: It is very difficult to get anyone to spend five minutes objectively examining the evidence ...<<
That doesn't answer WalterByrd's question. Why should anyone spend even five minutes "examining the evidence"? I have plenty of more important things to worry about, and spend my five minutes on.
Unless you have some theory as to how someone "planted explosives" and WHY, what is the point? Also, if nefarious person(s) did decide that it was a great idea to bring down this building "under cover" of the two large towers falling, why wouldn't they just plant a bunch of charges to make it come down helter skelter, rather then going to the engineering trouble of setting up the "spontaneous collapse" scenario that one achieves with meticulously calculated, placed, and timed charges that is required to intentionall get the "spontaneous collapse" scenario?
In other words, where are you trying going with this?
>>BritTim says: For those willing to spend five minutes on something vitally important, ...<<
No. It's much more then five minutes, before anyone is going to add any meaningful knowledge to this situation. In what sense is it "vitally important"?
The way it came down DOES seems unlikely. So? The tall towers came done in a way that was also not anticipated, and seems unlikely. Unless you have a theory for who did what and why, all such theories that I can imagine seem less likely than the fact that the building came down the way that it did, vis a vis the video of it coming down.
Why are you busy trying to ensnare the time of a bunch of people who aren't particularly qualified, to invest the time that it would take for them to become qualified, to answer a question whose answer has no actual consequence that you have put forward.
I really don't get it.