The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud | SCOXQ Message Board Posts

SCOXQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  153208 of 154318  at  9/17/2019 1:07:15 AM  by

BritTim


 In response to msg 153204 by  walterbyrd
view thread

Re: The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud

If such memories are unreliable, then they should be given no credibility - is that what you are saying? Would you apply the same reasoning to the accuser and the accused?

If the supposed victim recalls no such event, then what evidence is there?
There are many cases where other forms of evidence of a crime must be considered other than the testimony of the victim. As an example, you will find that there are few cases where a murder victim can testify against a murderer, but murderers can still often be prosecuted.  


     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 2     Views: 25
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
153234 Re: The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud walterbyrd 2 9/17/2019 12:21:11 PM
About Us  •  Contact Us  •  Follow Us on Twitter  •  Members Directory  •  Help Center  •  Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Create Account
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
© 2003-2019 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...