The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud | SCOXQ Message Board Posts

SCOXQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  153205 of 154318  at  9/16/2019 10:36:08 PM  by

walterbyrd


 In response to msg 153173 by  crunchie812
view thread

Re: The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud

> There are I number of things which I would never, under any circumstances, do. Unfortunately, there are reliable eyewitness reports to the contrary.

Name one. The entire story came from a Clinton crony. There is no credible evidence of any kind what-so-ever. There is no evidence this party even took place. And why wait for 30 years?

> Fortunately, this was long before cell phones with video. The old college "If you can't remember it, it didn't happen" no longer applies.

If you don't remember it, you certainly have no case. What if somebody accused you of rape, even though neither you, or the supposed victim remembered any of it? What if that person made his/her accusation very public, and tried to get you fired? Would that be fair? Or would that be defamation and/or slander and/or liable?

Trump has advised Kavanaugh to file some lawsuits. If Kavanaugh could get a fair trial, he would have a very strong case.


     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 2     Views: 17
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
About Us  •  Contact Us  •  Follow Us on Twitter  •  Members Directory  •  Help Center  •  Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Create Account
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
© 2003-2019 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...