Re: The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud
> There are I number of things which I would never, under any circumstances, do. Unfortunately, there are reliable eyewitness reports to the contrary.
Name one. The entire story came from a Clinton crony. There is no credible evidence of any kind what-so-ever. There is no evidence this party even took place. And why wait for 30 years?
> Fortunately, this was long before cell phones with video. The old college "If you can't remember it, it didn't happen" no longer applies.
If you don't remember it, you certainly have no case. What if somebody accused you of rape, even though neither you, or the supposed victim remembered any of it? What if that person made his/her accusation very public, and tried to get you fired? Would that be fair? Or would that be defamation and/or slander and/or liable?
Trump has advised Kavanaugh to file some lawsuits. If Kavanaugh could get a fair trial, he would have a very strong case.