OT: Now we know where tlaibs picked up "mother*ucker" as political speech | SCOXQ Message Board Posts

SCOXQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  145792 of 150946  at  1/11/2019 6:26:10 PM  by

walterbyrd

The following message was updated on 1/11/2019 6:26:51 PM.

 In response to msg 145790 by  crunchie812
view thread

Re: OT: Now we know where tlaibs picked up "mother*ucker" as political speech

> You are an idiot incapable of comprehending that a call to *harass* i.e. get in the faces of people involved in separating children from their families is NOT violence

What? I thought you leftists believed in "dog whistles?"

If you must split hairs and claim that inciting physical harassment is not inciting violence, then it still sets the bar awfully low, wouldn't you agree? Far worse than Trump's harsh criticisms.


> Separating children from the families IS violence, of the lowest sort, an act of administrative kidnapping.

Tell Obama, it started under his administration. They even used photos from the Obama administration to bash Trump - more than once. Of course, you had no problem with it, when Obama was doing it.

Again: the separations are being done to protect the children. If the illegals are undocumented, there is no way to know if the children they bring over are *their* children. Leaving the children with an unknown adult could be leaving the child with some human trafficking rapist.

And again: if the parents don't want their family separated, then the parents should not cross the border illegally. Blame the parents.


> Hilary Clinton saying there is no point in being civil to the GOP is not violence, in any way shape or form.

Certainly could be inciting violence. What exactly does it mean to not be civil? Even if you must insist this is not inciting violence, it certainly sets the bar awfully low doesn't it? A prominent political figure like Hillary telling people not be civil to those you disagree with politically? This is far worse than anything Trump has done.

> If someone took your coat and shoved you out into the Vermont winter in January, would you consider that being violent? Or merely uncivil? Oh wait, you don't know the difference.

Don't disrupt the rally if you don't want to be thrown out. Problem solved.

Again: Trump is not throwing people out because of their political opinions. He is throwing them out because they came there to disrupt the rally. Big difference. Trump never told his supporters to attack people just for having a different political opinion. Maxine waters did that, and Trump supporters have been attacked.

If leftists were being physically attacked all the time by conservatives, I wonder how you would feel if a group of conservatives got in your face and started harassing you? Because that is what Maxine said to do. She said to get a crowd together and get in their face. Maxine is certainly inciting physical intimidation, and harassment.



     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 2     Views: 29
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
145796 Re: OT: Now we know where tlaibs picked up "mother*ucker" as political speech BritTim 2 1/11/2019 8:32:51 PM
145799 Re: OT: Now we know where tlaibs picked up "mother*ucker" as political speech crunchie812 5 1/11/2019 10:23:22 PM
About Us    Contact Us    Follow Us on Twitter    Members Directory    Help Center    Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Create Account
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
2003-2018 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...