“Time to move on.”
Mois, the time to move on was when I posted an observation in the original message in this thread about who ‘recs’ who repeatedly over a period of time. Some people just can’t resist taking the bait.
White was correct in stating that you rec’d a post in which an opinion that Microsoft continues to use MicroVision tech was stated as incontrovertible fact. It might possibly be the case that Microsoft does continue to use MicroVision tech; we’ll have to see, but that's not the point.
White was also correct in pointing out that the post contained abusive elements.
Which part were you reccing? The opinion stated as fact, or the abuse? Or both? Or neither - just reccing for the sake of it?
Feel free to take these questions as rhetorical.
Time to move on.