Re: I must be clairvoyant / RECs
"You don't even understand anything"
If by "anything" you are referring to your failed attempts at justifiying your hypocrisy, then yes, we can agree on that one.
"Regarding the specific post/example, yes I would agree that post was all one-sided positive. That is not surprising. He is positive-mvis. Some others are negative-mvis, and many of their posts are all one-sided negative. As often, the "answer" probably lies somewhere between. RECing posts from both sides, allows readers to see comments from both sides, and determine their own "answers". "
That leads me straight back to where we started. What specifically was it about that post, which we agree was one-sided positive and abusive, did you feel the need to recommend? Did it have to do with the conversation about the subject that took place over on Reddit that you were recommending others should read or was it the one-sided positive and abusive post that you simply were agreeing with (something you claim that you do not use REC for)?