I must be clairvoyant / RECs | MVIS Message Board Posts

Microvision Inc.

  MVIS website
  • Membership Drive Update: In the first 48 hours we've hit almost 20% of our goal. An encouraging start to be sure, but we can't stop now. We need to pull enough subscription revenue forward to counter severe cash flow deficits resulting from a dramatic slow-down in ad spend thanks to the global pandemic which shows no signs of letting up in the near-term. We're doing everything in our power to keep our heads above some very choppy water, but we can't do it alone. We need your help. So if you've ever thought about giving our premium service a try, there's no better time to do it than right now by taking advantage of one of our discounted multi-year plans. Thanks in advance for your continued loyalty & support! 

  • Limited Premium Membership Offer
    Choose a Plan, Save Money & Help Us Survive the Pandemic

    Lifetime @ $399 (only 24 left)  5-yrs @ $199 (only 31 left)  2-yrs @ $99 (only 29 left)

MVIS   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  54670 of 54782  at  9/16/2020 1:21:10 PM  by

moissanite


Re: I must be clairvoyant / RECs

 
You don't even understand anything, let alone point anything out. 
 
A post can be part, or ALL, one-sided comments, and it merits a REC if it is relevant on-topic comments. REC has NOTHING to do with AGReeing with any or all comments. REC simply means the post is relevant and (in comparison to other posts) worthy of being read by those not reading everything, ......as always, in the opinion of the RECer.  
 
I could REC two different posts, from two different posters, one of which is completely one-sided positive-mvis, and the other of which is completely one-sided negative-mvis, if both are on-topic and not dominated by abuse. I could also REC a balanced post, with positive and negative comments, if we ever get one here. 
 
If/when IV adds an AGRee function, I will decide whether I want to give AGR's to indicate that I agree with some or all of the comments (and maybe the viewpoint) expressed in the post.
 
I understand that many folks use (IMO, misuse) the REC function to signal posts where they agree with the comments, or generally agree with the poster. I do NOT use REC that way. Why ? Because as an objective balanced evaluator of mvis, I don't think misusing REC to promote one side of the debate, is valuable. Promoting the reading, and discussion, of both/all sides is valuable.  Promoting relevant comments (regardless of side) is valuable. 
 
Regarding the specific post/example, yes I would agree that post was all one-sided positive. That is not surprising. He is positive-mvis. Some others are negative-mvis, and many of their posts are all one-sided negative. As often, the "answer" probably lies somewhere between. RECing posts from both sides, allows readers to see comments from both sides, and determine their own "answers".  
 
Time to move on.  
 
 


     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 0     Views: 30
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
54671 Re: I must be clairvoyant / RECs OneThousandPointsOfWhite 0 9/16/2020 2:07:24 PM
54672 Re: I must be clairvoyant / RECs franfurt 1 9/16/2020 2:24:21 PM






Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...