Another try.......again aimed at explaining how I use REC (and think it should be used, to be useful), not offering to explain each REC.
Except for the last two sentences, the whole rest of the post is "worthy of a REC" (and as with anybody giving RECs, a REC from me is JMHO, in my case about the relevance). It is up to readers here to decide if they want to also read the reddit discussion, or add comments via reply here, or just read the RECed post, or skip it altogether.
Again, when I give a REC, it means RECommend, not AGRee. So, NO, it does not mean I agree with the one-sided comments. Feel free to rationally post a reply containing relevant other-sided comments, and not dominated by abuse, and I would probably REC that post also (again, depending on my opinion of relevance and abuse level).
The whole board is more about raising questions, than providing answers. It is about info and opinions that can raise questions that test a theory (pro or anti mvis theory), so readers can reach their own "answers".