"I'm not going to explain every REC. But to help you understand....."
I am not asking you to "explain every REC", I simply asked about the most recent one and to use that as a working example of what you are claiming. Your essay did nothing to explain my question.
What part of that particular post that was posted by CO3aii do you feel is worthy of a REC? Is there some part of the discussion on Reddit about the issue of the manufacturing takeover that MVIS agreed to that you found was important? Are you claiming that this Reddit conversation was worthy of review or are you simply claiming that any conversation about the manufacturing takeover is worthy of review as that certainly would make no sense and offer no time saving to any reader. Or are you agreeing with the one sided conclusions and observations that the poster made about this issue? Your REC leaves more questions than answers.
Try again, here it is once more...
"In response to msg 54623 by co3aii Strong Buy
Re: HL2 Waveguide-Reddit post by s2upid
Interesting conversation over on Reddit to sum up: If MSFT was not going to continue using MVIS components then why in the world would they takeover manufacturing and pay MVIS what would have been MVIS's profit on the components? Why is the pre payment still being reduced?
Would MSFT, now doing the manufacturing, still use the MVIS logo or use their own? Is that transfer what is confusing the haters? Probably so."...................