Again, THANKS for that report. Most excellent.
<<<They intend to do this via projector engines rather than products......They intend to be platform-agnostic.>>>
That sounds good. But does AT seem to waver a bit on this ?
<<<The prototypes and their "bells and whistles" are not pursued as products but as inspirations for the prospective OEMs.>>>
That jumped out at me also. I still wonder why MicroVision is doing these prototypes. Why do they have to inspire OEMs ? Why aren't the OEMs already inspired, and pulling for pico projection engines (in general, and specifically from MicroVision) ? We like to assume that DGLs is the main holdup, and once we get volumes of DGLs, we'll have OEMs begging for engines. But if that is the case, why is MicroVision wasting resources (and increasing dilution) by developing these prototypes to inspire ?