|
|
Cleantech
|
|
||
Nickel supply, ESG, Tsingshian Commentary on Tsingshian's announcement last week that they plan to produce nickel matte form nickel pig iron. This is from Conic Metals, talking their own book. The message is hypocritical given that Conic's nickel production is from a Papua New Guinea HPAL operation that dumps its acid tailings into the ocean. Conic Metals Corp., soon to be renamed Nickel 28 Capital Corp. (“Nickel 28” or the “Company”) (TSXV: NKL) (FSE: 3JC) is pleased to provide clarification regarding GHG emissions related to the extraction and production of nickel for the EV industry. Justin Cochrane, Nickel 28’s President and CEO stated “Recent industry news about conversion of Nickel Pig Iron (NPI) to nickel matte have resulted in speculation that new nickel supply is available to feed the requirements of the EV industry and new investment in added capacity is no longer as critical. While this development is not new and was expected by the industry, we believe it is important that our investors have a full picture of what this means.” Recently Tsingshan Holding Group announced that it would supply nickel to two customers by converting NPI into nickel matte, which can be further refined into nickel sulphate or Class 1 nickel. This has resulted in significant volatility in the nickel price over the last few days. It is not clear what approach Tsingshan will be using to produce the nickel matte but it will involve a similar or elevated level of greenhouse gas generation (GHG) as producing nickel pig iron and will have the added burden of SO2 emissions as well. “I don’t believe North American or European automakers would or should be buying products that contain nickel with the expected GHG footprint of this nickel matte production in Indonesia,” noted Nickel 28’s Chairman, Anthony Milewski. According to recent information provided by Wood Mackenzie Scope 1+2 emissions for NPI production are anywhere from 40 to 80 tCO2e per t of Ni, with Tsingshan estimated at 44. By introducing another energy intensive pyrometallurgical process step it is safe to assume that the emission intensity will only increase. “Although reported as novel, the production of nickel matte from laterites has been around for decades and practiced by PT Vale in Indonesia and Eramet in New Caledonia, using two different approaches” commented Martin Vydra, EVP of Strategy and an expert in nickel processing. “It’s likely more energy intensive and it adds cost to a product that still sells at a discount to the LME” added Mr. Vydra. “Many companies have looked at it, but the economics are not there and with growing awareness and focus on GHG emissions, it just did not make sense. I’m sure Tsingshan has their reasons, but to me this indicates a shortage of nickel for EV batteries that is looming closer than the industry anticipates. We understand that capacity to convert nickel to sulphate in China is at its limit. It is not limited by nickel availability, it is limited by dissolving capacity. Matte leaching (converting nickel matte to a refined nickel product) is more complex and expensive than dissolving nickel briquettes or powder.” “Compared to Ramu’s intensity of less than 16 tCO2e/t of Ni in MHP, Tsingshan’s production of matte from laterite could be orders of magnitude greater and that does not even account for SO2 emissions” noted Mr. Cochrane. “When the world is under pressure to eliminate GHG emissions, it appears that Tsingshan has gone in the opposite direction. I’m not sure how this can be acceptable to Western OEMs and especially the likes of Elon Musk and Tesla who are publicly committed to carbon neutrality in their products.” “We expect to make further disclosure regarding our commitment to carbon neutrality in the coming weeks” noted Nickel 28’s Chairman, Anthony Milewski, “and we think it is important for global consumers of nickel to completely understand the source of their supply and all of the ESG factors associated with that supply” |
return to message board, top of board |