CS's puny attempt to declare 'Mea Culpa' is really trying to 'paper over' an astonishingly bad analysis. To miss the LDH caveat in the report can (should?) only be explained as "I didn't read the report before I commented' [most face saving] OR [honestly]..."It was proactive attempt to find a way to attack the efficacy of PV-10."
But looky looky...there never is an admission of error...but instead "...I agree that I could be wrong...!
But never fear Board readers...CS will be back to his/her old tricks soon enough!