|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Data from Webcast slides1. Unadjusted log-rank: HR 0.766 with p value 0.023.
2. Cox-adjusted: HR 0.775 with p value 0.032.
3. Adjusted for Taxotere and timing: HR 0.763 with p value 0.036.
4. Cancer-specific survival: HR 0.772 with p value 0.036.
5. Integrated data D9901+D9902a+IMPACT: HR 0.735 with p value 0.001.
6. TTP again failed with p value 0.628. Not much of a surprise here.
7. 36-month survival for treatment arm consistent across all three trials at about 33%.
8. 36-month survival for control arm went up slightly to 23% from 21% in D9902a.
9. No serious safety issues.
The survival data are remarkably consistent across all three datasets, D9901, D9902a and IMPACT. The Cox model, in fact, worsened the p value of IMPACT somewhat over the unadjusted log-rank data. But the Cox p value for the integrated data, D9901+D9902a+IMPACT, was a remarkable 0.001. That is, the chance of that dataset being a fluke is less than one in one thousand! This is a clear and unequivocal proof that Provenge works!
|
![]() |
return to message board, top of board |
| Msg # | Subject | Author | Recs | Date Posted |
| 268277 | Re: Data from Webcast slides - ocyan | shamblinthru | 1 | 4/28/2009 6:07:49 PM |
| 268638 | Re: Data from Webcast slides-Ocyan | 1045 | 1 | 4/28/2009 9:12:53 PM |


















