|
|
|
|
||
Re: Pocket Aces - Don - Sam here“Those users, who do not find existing standards for security adequate, and who do not find VHC tech acceptable.”
Sam,
There can be no third set of users. If a user does not want VirnetX technology that user will have to stay with the current standards. To serve the worldwide community, the internet must have standardization and that is the purpose of the standards bodies such as the ATIS, IETF and 3GPP. If a company claims to have invented a method of securing communications that is different from Gabriel, but is not yet an internet standard, the 3GPP specifications will not incorporate that technology until the standards bodies recommend it. It was the ATIS that invited VirnetX to declare its patents essential for the 3GPP specifications.
The internet standards always begin as a new invention that is considered by the standards bodies (for years or decades) and eventually become documented in IETF publications.
At this time the VirnetX patents are considered to be essential for the 3GPP specifications and eventually VirnetX technology will be an internet standard. As I said in my previous post any part of the 3GPP specification that is not needed in a network (such as secure domains and secure VPN technology) will simply not be implemented.
On the other hand, FirstNet requires the best possible security available and that will be VirnetX technology because that is what the 3GPP specifications require. All in my opinion. |
return to message board, top of board |