>>Sdtrond are you always looking for coal in your Christmas stocking ?
Haha Swoosh, I do not post much anymore but I am long and have been here since 2010.
If you specifically believe there IS recurring royalties in this amendment, please say why. I have no issues with people correctly highlighting factual issues in negative posts and also in reverse.
This is an odd situation because what euphorbus said was not factually wrong, but expecting more revenue than the $23M is not something that I expect to happen. It is an opinion, but please do not think that opinion extends to the stock in general. :-)