Although SCOTUS has heard a number of patent cases lately, as a rule they take very few. And those they do take always have some broad legal concept that the SCOTUS wants to address. And more often than not, they usually take a case to change the law.
So unless they think that the damages issue is a significant legal issue with wide-ranging implications, and they feel the issue was decided incorrectly, they likely won't take it. I don't think it really matters how carefully the CAFC opinion is crafted.