P. Dodger<

 

I took the liberty of extending your schedule by a column, to show the percentage of non-producing wells to total wells.  Given depletion, growth in production or the maintenance of current production can only come from the wells that are not yet producing.  Observers already know what is happening and about to happen in Haynesville production, but I thought it was interesting to look at the declines in non-producing (waiting on completion, drilling, and permitted) to the total number of wells:

 

Total	Non-
	Producing
1619	917	57%
1650	922	56%
1660	918	55%
1684	924	55%
1691	923	55%
1703	922	54%
1718	917	53%
1740	931	54%
1758	925	53%
1763	916	52%
1788	926	52%
1808	933	52%
1815	932	51%
1835	939	51%
1846	943	51%
1856	925	50%
1865	918	49%
1869	910	49%
1897	935	49%
1894	910	48%
1936	932	48%
1945	909	47%
1970	927	47%
1984	929	47%
2007	917	46%
2028	931	46%
2032	908	45%
2040	911	45%
2048	890	43%
2056	889	43%
2073	891	43%
2076	875	42%
2084	883	42%
2096	877	42%
2109	872	41%
2111	875	41%
2125	870	41%
2142	867	40%
2151	860	40%
2149	844	39%
2154	827	38%
2163	808	37%
2185	812	37%
2188	815	37%
2179	806	37%
2169	796	37%
2140	771	36%
2148	763	36%
2135	759	36%
2220	754	34%
2237	755	34%
2252	754	33%
2268	754	33%
2283	753	33%
2292	754	33%
2303	735	32%
2320	729	31%
2332	719	31%
2345	709	30%
2354	703	30%
2364	698	30%
2370	692	29%
2376	686	29%
2381	668	28%
2386	650	27%
2402	659	27%
2409	656	27%
2412	633	26%
2416	611	25%
2408	581	24%
2410	573	24%
2388	530	22%
2391	512	21%
2390	510	21%
2392	504	21%
2403	496	21%
2403	483	20%
2399	478	20%