FNMA   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 


 








bonno44
carter1500
fuzzywzhe13
humblefrank
incahoots
kartman0007
mwsmith
Trading Baby
waylonglvlt
Williamv
youngNsuccessful
zatires
zman1527



My FNMA Ignore List


Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  672929 of 732767  at  4/27/2012 2:52:13 PM  by

ralphtard


 In response to msg 672926 by  alsi
ignore topicview thread,  thread start

Re: sold AEM at 39 short amzn at 227

 the lawsuits are a non issue, the 500M in loans could be but it should not hurt CHK.  From what I think, the loans were to pay for the developement cost for Aubrey's 2.5% ownership interest and backed by Aubrey's interest and not the 97.5% that CHK has.  Now if Aubrey deflaults on these loans, the bank will assume the 2,5% ownership but not CHK's position.  The only potential impact is that the banks may not put up the $$ for their portion of cost. CHK is looking to lock in LNG deals with asia which could monetize assets, but then again, this could be the next enron.


 
     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 1  |  Views: 64
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
672931 Re: sold AEM at 39 short amzn at 227 alsi 4/27/2012 2:58:00 PM
672936 Re: sold AEM at 39 short amzn at 227 alsi 3 4/27/2012 3:25:49 PM


About Us  •  Contact Us  •  Follow Us on Twitter  •  Members Directory  •  Help  •  Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Join Now
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
© 2003-2013 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...