"I'm going to go ahead and vote for #3 and make the leap of logic that the one person was Gary Weiss. "

Of course you pick that because it's what you WANT to be true. Unfortunately, wanting something to be true does not make it so.

"2- Amazon.com admins deleted all seven reviewers reviews within the same hour. Their reasons are their own."

You try to make this option seem unlikely when it is VERY likely and almost certain. Since I reported evren's review on Sunday night, Amazon would almost certainly have scrutinized his review and the web site he called out in it.

It would be a remarkable coincidence that evren's review disappeared (Amazon had to remove it), at the very same time all the other one's went. You have to believe Weiss waited all this time after your article to take them down and it perfectly coincided with evren's disappearing. If this is your belief, you need to buy a lotto ticket today.

You and evren have conspired (with a little help from me) to engineer a clear chain of events and you attribute it to Weiss. Amazing.

I originally thought you were simply lying about all of this. The missing chains of logic are quite clear. I'm now of the opinion that you really believe it. It's the power of the positive feeback loop that oozes through all stock boards, only it's far more rabid here than anywhere else. It doesn't matter what gap in logic exists. The desire for it to be so simply fills in that gap in your brain.