|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Daumier-Smith, You asked to discuss subpoena response ethicsNot under your admitted pseudonyms anyway.
Yippee! Scipio just gave me a clean bill of FD health! You seem to have less hesitation with your secret, spying ids however.
Um...ok...last I checked you said Stockfoo was someone other than me...a "cohort" is the term you used, as I recall. Even if it were me, I don't see how recognizing the existence of OSTK shares and factors that bear upon their buying and selling is anything close to encouraging their buying and/or selling. In other words, not only do you have nothing, your fallacious (that's not a dirty word, Sam) argument is backed up by nothing as well. Hey folks, what you've just witnessed is yet another example of the sort of reasoning that backs up every claim this guy makes. Fortunately, I'm just about certain everybody gets the Scipio joke by now. I'm also quite certain that traffic to O-smear is down to a trickle these days, which is why I'm ready to let you in on a little secret. No, let's be sporting about it. First person to find the hidden O-smear goodie here gets to be my date to the Senior Prom! Warm regards, De Daumier-Smith ps: Hey Scipio, have you seen Wiseacre1000 around lately? I have something to tell him.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
return to message board, top of board |
| Msg # | Subject | Author | Recs | Date Posted |
| 7267 | Re: Daumier-Smith, You asked to discuss subpoena response ethics | evren | 5/12/2007 1:01:29 AM | |



















