Re: Daumier-Smith, You asked to discuss subpoena response ethics
Well I see we all now know where to find Sam Antar on this board.
Mind if I just call you HectorSAMtos?
The reasons I did not answer you are many. First, I didn't notice your earlier post until now. Second, even if I had, I feel no obligation to answer every trolling question posed me, as you of all trolls should know. Third, you're asking me to comment on something related directly to OSTK, and with maybe five minor, tangential, past exceptions, I don't talk about OSTK -- and never discuss the stock -- here (hence the inapplicability of Reg FD). Fourth, I have so many things to do each day...message boards just don't play the same role in my life as they clearly do yours. Fifth, I know better than to think that anything I might have said would get through to you, anyway.
My post on ASM is not intended to serve as a point of comparison with anything. Instead, all the chatter of responses to subpoenae (that may look like a dirty word, Sam, but it's not) merely served to remind me that I've had that post on Cramer sitting in reserve for about two months.
So there you go.