Kimball's record on appeal of summary judgment | SCOXQ Message Board Posts

SCO Group Inc.

  SCOXQ website

SCOXQ   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 

 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  45775 of 127573  at  10/3/2007 12:50:31 PM  by

codswallet


 In response to msg 45752 by  
view thread

Re: Kimball's record on appeal of summary judgment

Using your link I found -


661 cases
267 remanded
192 affirmed in part

250 cases of summary judgment
124 remands were from summary judgment
of these 98 were affirmed in part

26 not affirmed in part

22% 00-4017 -- Fernandez v. Galetka -- 08/10/2000 (D.C. No. 97-CV-318J)
24% 00-4058 -- Utah Licensed Beverage Association v. Leavitt -- 07/24/2001 (D.C. No. 2:96-CV-581-S)
29% 00-4124 -- W.N.J. v. Yocom -- 07/10/2001 (D.C. No. 91-CV-645)
25% 01-4111 -- First Unitarian Church of Salt lake City v. Salt lake City Corp. -- 10/09/2002 (D.C. No. 2:99-CV-912-ST)
22% 01-4129 -- Davis v. Mineta -- 06/20/2002 (D.C. No. 00-CV-993-C)
26% 01-4135 -- PETA v. Rasmussen -- 08/07/2002 (D. Ct. No. 2:99-CV-48-B)
26% 01-4215 -- Bingham Livestock Transportation. Inc. v. Mead -- 06/06/2003 (D.Ct. No. 01-CV-6-ST)
23% 01-6194 -- Sherwood v. Oklahoma County -- 07/10/2002 Oklahoma case
21% 02-4147 -- Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp. -- 12/23/2003 (D.C. No. 2:00-CV-454-K)
26% 02-4192 -- Kinross v. Uthah Railway Co. -- 03/22/2004 (D.C. No. 01-CV-10-BSJ)
30% 03-4073 -- Dickey v. Merrick -- 12/19/2003 (D.C. No.2:97-CV-782-TC)
21% 03-4166 -- U.S. v. Artez -- 11/17/2004 (D.C. No. 2:01-CR-180-S)
26% 04-4012 -- Alva v. Teen Help -- 11/22/2006 (D.C. No.2:00-CV-169-TC)
23% 05 4114 Holman v. U.S. (D.C. No. 1:02-CV-77-J)
25% 05-4161 -- Bronson v. Swensen -- 08/29/2007 (D.C. No.2:00-CV-169-TC)
26% 06-4104 -- U.S. v. VanDam -- 07/10/2007 (No. 1:01-CR-101-DB)
26% 96-4104 -- Woodman v. Runyon -- 12/24/1997 (D.C. No. 92-CV-427)
23% 97-4014 -- Howell v. U.S. -- 12/29/1998 (D.C. No. 93-CV-952)
26% 97-4015 -- State of Utah v. Babbitt -- 03/03/1998 (D.C. No. 96-CV-870)
22% 97-4062 -- U.S. v. Gallardo-Mendez -- 07/28/1998 (D.C. No. 96-CR-176)
24% 97-4116 -- Hardman v. Specialty Services -- 05/14/1999 (D.C. No. 95-CV-180-C)
25% 97-4140 -- Reliance Insurance Co. V. Mast Construction Co. -- 08/03/1998 (D.C. No. CIV-88-947-S)
26% 97-4140 -- Reliance Insurance Co. V. Mast Construction Co. -- 11/05/1998 (D.C. No. CIV-88-947-S)
26% 98-4179 -- Oliver v. Woods -- 04/17/2000 (D.C. No. 97-CV-106-K) This is a split decision that is clearly wrongly decided
26% 98-4202 -- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Dabney -- 08/15/2000 (D.C. No. 95-CV-559-K) complicated involving federal regulations and there only was one issue appealed
22% 99-4149 -- Davis v. Norris -- 05/01/2002 (D.C. No. 96-CV-359K) 2 parts disdtrict court screws up and court of appeals pulls a rabbit out of its hat

20 cases of 25 attributable
4 K Dale Kimball
2 J Bruce Jenkins ?
1 BSJ Bruce Jenkins
4 S David Sam ?
2 ST Ted Stuart ?
2 C Paul Cassell
3 TC Tina Campbell
1 B Dee Benson?
1 DB Dee Benson

Kimball remands 12

29% 01-4009 -- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Norton -- 08/29/2002
30% 01-4017 -- Ashley Creek Phosphate Company v. Chevron USA, Inc. -- 01/02/2003
29% 01-4027 -- Jacobsen v. Deseret Book Co. -- 04/19/2002
24% 01-4106 -- Murphree v. U.S. Bank of Utah -- 06/19/2002
23% 02-4147 -- Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp. -- 12/23/2003
36% 02-4169 -- L.B. v. Nebo School District -- 08/11/2004
31% 05-4088 -- U.S. v. Regence Bluecross -- 12/05/2006
31% 98-4092 -- District 22 United Mine Workers of America v. State of Utah -- 10/12/2000 Withdrawn
31% 98-4092a -- District 22 United Mine Workers of America v. State of Utah -- 10/12/2000
28% 98-4179 -- Oliver v. Woods -- 04/17/2000
30% 98-4202 -- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Dabney -- 08/15/2000
32% 99-4067 -- Proctor & Gamble Co. V. Haugen -- 08/23/2000 withdrawn
32% 99-4067a -- Proctor & Gamble Co. V. Haugen -- 08/23/2000
29% 99-4082 -- Femedeer v. Haun -- 08/28/2000

not remanded 8

36% 00-4067 -- Snyder v. Cache County -- 08/29/2001
42% 00-4151 -- Mountain West Helicopters v. Textron Inc. -- 07/11/2001
33% 01-4023 -- Villagrana v. Graham -- 03/06/2003
31% 01-4084 -- Brown v. Millard County -- 09/20/2002 withdrawn
33% 01-4084a -- Brown v. Millard County -- 09/20/2002
34% 01-4142 -- Joseph v. Yocum -- 11/26/2002
33% 99-4114 -- Winkel v. Kennecott Holdings Corp. -- 01/10/2001
35% 99-4139 -- Vincent v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation -- 06/21/2000
30% 99-4173 -- Merrell v. ICEE-USA Corp. -- 12/19/2000


so of 20 attributable cases 8 are affirmed 8 affirmed in part and 4 reversed in toto, some of which had only 1 issue appealed

This seems to be about average. Of course there are some unattributed cases and half of all appeals in the 10th are rejected on procedural grounds. So MOG's figures are probably correct, but misleading, since most of here reversals were reversed only in part, and Kimball's record is average on the whole .and better than average in the last half of his tenure.

On pure statistics, ignoring the merits, their chances of even a partial reversal are no more than 20%.


 
     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 49     Views: 6770 (updated 24hrs)
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
45785 Re: Kimball's record on appeal of summary judgment ranterjmc 5 10/3/2007 2:04:07 PM
45792 Re: Kimball's record on appeal of summary judgment peragrin 2 10/3/2007 2:38:28 PM
45796 Re: The sad part: Kimball's record on appeal of summary judgment con_fuse9 4 10/3/2007 2:50:36 PM


About Us    Contact Us    Follow Us on Twitter    Members Directory    Help    Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Join Now
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
2003-2014 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.

Loading...