Re: Item 92
>> Perhaps the example, tab 92, which is raised by Mr. Marriott the first time here -- it hasn't been raised below. It hasn't been raised in briefing. This is the first time that example comes up -- if that one is too general, it should be excluded, but you don't throw out all these parts of our case.
This whine is brought to you by Boies, Schiller and Flexner -- proud to proclaim that Quality Assurance is the other guy's job. <<
This is consistent with BSF's performance throughout the lawsuit(s). Shoddy research, cutting corners, and not enough attention to detail. It's probably due to limiting the resource allocated to their SC0 client -- putting interns on the research end, etc.