• We are currently testing fixes to the following bugs: Ignores, Inbox Folder Access, Hide Replies, View Thread & a few others. It's taking a little longer than we had hoped, but we expect to push out corrected code this Friday night. We apologize for the delay & appreciate your continued patience. Stay tuned for further updates.

MMT.V   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 


 








crocus
go blue
Public_Heel
Resilience
rgm714
Sheryl



My MMT.V Ignore List


Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  3173 of 5934  at  5/3/2012 5:55:38 PM  by

Oullins

The following message was updated on 5/3/2012 6:22:42 PM.

 In response to msg 3170 by  trying2win
ignore topicview thread,  thread start

Re: UMU9 and UMU10 costs - Oullins

Hold a sec here T2W

First of all it is not my stance, I am just explaining what the facts are. Do not shoot the messenger.

The cost is what it is.

$5M a month now and that includes infrastructure work, G&A equipment down hole, pipes  etc. Rigs will cost $4M + a month with pipes, equipment etc.

What is more important is that you cannot do anything without the partners approval.  Remember that it is not Mart's field it is Midwestern and Suntrust field and it would come right out of their pocket without increase in production during that time. It would not come out of Mart's pocket.  Expenses are paid in oil as they occur.

Regarding the tax holiday it is 3 years back and 2 years forward.  It will end at the end of 2013 or about 3 to 4 months after the pipeline is ready.

During that time using one rig we can drill 2 to 3 wells at 4K BOPD a piece and re-enter 2 wells as horizontal wells for 9K a piece. All of that with the rig we have.   At the present we could pump 18K to 19K.  That would bring you to a total of 45K to 49K BOPD when the pipeline becomes operational late Q3 2013.

The capacity allocated by Shell is 25K,  add 16K from AGIP that's 41K BOPD so unless Shell allocates more capacity you are still pipeline constrained and you would not have any tax holiday benefits by having even more production you cannot ship.

 

One small hint.  The partners problem would go away if we had a merger.  You would also cut down the technical teams from 3 teams to 1 team.

 

We are going to be just fine.

 

GLTY

 



 
     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 13  |  Views: 441
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board

Replies
Msg # Subject Author Recs Date Posted
3175 Re: UMU9 and UMU10 costs - Oullins trying2win 5 5/3/2012 7:11:03 PM
3184 Re: UMU9 and UMU10 costs - Oullins - Merger. And question on insider buys Resilience 3 5/4/2012 4:24:40 AM


About Us  •  Contact Us  •  Follow Us on Twitter  •  Members Directory  •  Help  •  Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Join Now
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
© 2003-2013 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...