Re: New paper finds a large warming bias in Northern Hemisphere temperatures from 'non-valid' station data
>Statisticians and economists on average are probably better at analyzing this type of data than are climate scientists."
Tamino is one of the best statisticians in the field today, but when I post his work here, you claim he isn't qualified, or that his work is invalid. Why is that?
And the "New paper" you posted the link to concludes that your claim is wrong that the raw data are correct. You have repeatedly demanded here that the raw temperature data should be used, not the adjusted data. And now you post a "New paper" that argues the raw data are wrong.
You often shoot yourself in the face, but this time you have blown your whole head off.