CHK WITHOUT THE FRAT BOYS - Marcellus Benefits Far Outweigh Environmental Concerns, Says Report - CHK WITHOUT THE FRAT BOYS - InvestorVillage
CHK WITHOUT THE FRAT BOYS (related stock CHK)
This is a semi-private group. You are free to browse messages, but you must be a member of this group to post messages. Join This Group

Group: CHK WITHOUT THE FRAT BOYS   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 
 






Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  17063 of 30062  at  6/8/2011 12:38:01 PM  by

gordon54838


Marcellus Benefits Far Outweigh Environmental Concerns, Says Report

Marcellus Benefits Far Outweigh Environmental Concerns, Says Report

The economic benefits of developing shale natural gas resources in the state of New York are "enormous" and vastly outweigh the "small" environmental costs, according to a new report by the Manhattan Institute's Center for Energy Policy and The Environment.

"The Economic Opportunities of Shale Energy Development," which was issued on Tuesday, was compiled by Timothy J. Considine, who directs the Center for Energy Economics and Public Policy at the University of Wyoming. He previously worked at Pennsylvania State University (Penn State).

Co-author Robert W. Watson of Penn State also chairs the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP) Oil and Gas Technical Advisory Board. Nicholas B. Considine, also a co-author, is an analyst at Natural Resource Economics Inc.

"Our findings suggest that the current shale gas drilling moratorium imposes a significant and needless burden on the New York state economy," the authors said. "In short, the economic benefits of developing shale gas resources in New York state are enormous and could be growing, while the environmental costs of doing so are small and could be diminishing if the moratorium is lifted and if proper policies are put into place."

New York has had a de facto hydraulic fracturing (fracking) moratorium in place since 2008 after former Gov. David Paterson directed state regulators to prepare a supplemental generic environmental impact statement (SGEIS) to update drilling regulations.. Paterson last December vetoed an outright fracking ban but extended until July 1 the SGEIS..

State legislators also continue to push for a ban on fracking. Late Monday the state's Assembly approved legislation to limit fracking; the state Senate has yet to act (see related story).

The Manhattan Institute's report said the moratorium is a mistake.

"Directional drilling and hydraulic fracturing have unlocked vast new reserves of natural gas in the United States," the report said. "Development of these resources is now well under way in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Unlike their neighbors to the south, however, New York residents are not directly benefiting from natural gas development as the result of a government-imposed moratorium, itself a response to environmental concerns surrounding hydraulic fracturing."

According to their research, the authors said the net economic benefits to the state from gas drilling would be huge:

  • An end to the moratorium would spur more than $11.4 billion in economic output.
  • Between 15,000 and 18,000 jobs could be created in the Southern Tier and in western New York, regions which, according to the state's Department of Labor, lost an estimated 48,000 payroll jobs between 2000 and 2010.
  • Another 75,000 to 90,000 jobs could be created if the area of exploration and drilling were expanded to include the Utica Shale and southeastern New York, including the New York City watershed -- assuming a regulatory regime is in place to protect the water supply but permit drilling.
  • Localities and the state stand to reap $1.4 billion in tax revenues if the moratorium is allowed to expire.

The authors also reviewed the public records of environmental violations reported by the Pennsylvania DEP between 2008 and 2010, where extensive Marcellus Shale drilling is under way. The researchers then quantified the impact of these violations on land, water and air resources.

"The costs of these environmental impacts are then estimated on the basis of the value of the environmental amenities at stake," the authors said. "Our main finding is that the cost of these environmental impacts is far smaller than the economic benefits that drilling can provide."

As they explained, a "typical Marcellus Shale gas well generates about $4 million in economic benefits" while the economic damage resulting from the environmental impacts of a typical shale gas well comes to $14,000.

"The expected environmental costs are so low because the probability of an environmental event is small, and those that do occur are minor and localized in their effects," the report stated.

Environmental problems that have arisen in Pennsylvania in connection with fracking "in no way call into question the soundness of that procedure. In reality, they result from improper drilling and well-casing technique and defective formulation of cement. Such errors and flaws allow wells to penetrate shallow gas deposits, permitting the gas within them to escape and enter groundwater supplies.

"Marcellus gas resides far below these deposits and any aquifers. More stringent design standards should be adopted, and more active regulatory oversight should be exercised. These steps would reduce the incidence of such problems.



 
     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 2     Views: 1195 (updated 24hrs)
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board


About Us    Contact Us    Follow Us on Twitter    Members Directory    Help    Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Join Now
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
2003-2014 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.

Loading...